Church Files Brief on Behalf of God, Asks Court to Retain Prop 8
The Kingdom of Heaven, a church in San Diego, CA has filed an amicus brief in support of retaining Proposition 8 - on behalf of God.
Here's an excerpt:
See the original document here. Warning: it reads like a church sermon in a scorchin' hot Southern Baptist Black church - long, boring, and repetitive.
The writer of this brief has declared herself the Divine Queen and Heiress of the Almighty Eternal Creator and states that 9/11 was our fault because we disobeyed God.
Wacko.
Originally posted: http://sisterstalk.tblog.com/post/1970031798
Here's an excerpt:
See the original document here. Warning: it reads like a church sermon in a scorchin' hot Southern Baptist Black church - long, boring, and repetitive.
The writer of this brief has declared herself the Divine Queen and Heiress of the Almighty Eternal Creator and states that 9/11 was our fault because we disobeyed God.
Wacko.
Originally posted: http://sisterstalk.tblog.com/post/1970031798
Comment
-
Comment by dudess on December 10, 2008 at 10:12am - NEXT !!
-
Comment by dudess on December 10, 2008 at 10:11am
-
yeah, but is it notorized ??
God would have to notorize it for it to be valid..
(by showing His driver's license)
and in order to do that He'd have to have two concrete forms of ID.. and auxillary one..
(I think one of them has to be a picture ID)
so He'd need like, a driver's license, a social security card and a voter's registration card..
and to get an ss card, you have to show a birth certificate.. which you can't get a copy of unless you have a notorized statement of who you are..
and you can't get a notorized statement without ID..
I think even God couldn't get past the prick at DMV
so until it's notorized, it can't be entered as evidence.
(hey, it's not my rules.. you go get God to notorize this and then we can accept it)
-
Comment by Meredith on December 2, 2008 at 6:45pm - Reminds me of the guy who sued God. (And God said, ha!)
-
Comment by p.Johanna on November 25, 2008 at 1:04am
- i am not a dr and i dont mean to put anyone down, but can we say schizophrenic?
-
Comment by ragnarokfinis on November 21, 2008 at 10:13am - In an Amicus Brief filed by Eddie Tabash which overturned the initial ban on gay marriage, he makes the secular point that "if you have a law that relies on religious belief, then it is unconstitutional". Hopefully, everyone realises this and begins to shift to that sort of thinking...
-
Comment by Natalie Davis on November 21, 2008 at 10:09am - We should be thankful. I assume the California Supremes will take one look and dismiss this, but the thought will be in their minds... and that could help our case. This amicus brief spells out the problem with the Yes on 8 argument -- it is motivated primarily by religious belief. They voted to take citizens' rights away on the back of a certain religious belief. That flies in the face of all that is decent and American. I'm just praying the judges see this and realize that there remains no compelling interest to discriminate against LGBTs and do their duty to protect an unpopular minority from the tyranny of a religiously motivate and bigoted majority.
-
Comment by SteadyCat on November 20, 2008 at 7:16pm - Why do crazy people and extremely stupid people not know about themselves. If I was extremely stupid, I would at least know to talk only to friends and family about this nonsense. Why are they letting her show the world how ridiculous she is?
-
Comment by Morwen Madrigal on November 20, 2008 at 1:06pm - Oh Goddess! What fools these people be. *rolls eyes*
-
Comment by ragnarokfinis on November 20, 2008 at 12:45pm
-
So, I read through the Amicus Brief. As an Adjudicator, I immediately started laughing (to the point where my roommate made sure I was not going to be sick. I feel it is important, therefore, for me to write several amicus briefs based upon other literary works and to write on behalf of the main characters.
So far, I have Catcher in the Rye, Harry Potter, and Atlas Shrugged on the line. Or, perhaps I should write on behalf of the spirit of the constitution of the united states of america.
Far be it from me to trod upon the religion of another user here; however, I think we can all unite in laughing at this situation. This woman said that she saw all of this in a dream. In my dreams, I sometimes have dreams that are like the Viking legends of lore where I am fighting on Asgard during Ragnarok; does this give me permission to go on a rampage ?
When you use a book written thousands of years ago that has no verification for the doctrine therein and say "an invisible, intangible, all-powerful being that exists on another plane of existence told me in a state of mind that is considered to be fantasy by most modern psychologists that what they are doing is wrong and they will be punished for it because he is the owner of us all," what else is there to do but laugh ?
-
Comment by Keith on November 20, 2008 at 12:00pm - I have officially had my good laugh for the day!
The GayWallet Team
SistersTalk (on Twitter)
JaySays (on Twitter)
Robin45 (on Twitter)
Joanne Kerr (on Twitter)
Please read the community rules.
JaySays (on Twitter)
Robin45 (on Twitter)
Joanne Kerr (on Twitter)
Please read the community rules.
© 2010 Created by Genia Stevens.
You need to be a member of GayWallet.com to add comments!
Join GayWallet.com